Friday, May 8, 2020

GOLDEN HAND SHAKE



It was Dec 2002 and I was posted as the Group Commander NCC Mysore.

One fine morning I received a frantic message from the Sub Area HQ Bangalore that the then President His Exellency Dr Abdul Kalam would be landing at Mysore Helipad on 29th Dec by 1100 H and as per protocol I, being the Senior Armed Force’s rep at Mysore, am to receive him at the Helipad. The President was arriving at Mysore to inaugurate a function at JSS Mutt in the suburbs of Mysore.

Protocol demanded that when the President who is also the Supreme Commander of Armed Forces visits a station, the senior Army, Navy and Air force officials posted at the station received him. I contacted the District Commissioner and the Commissioner of Police and informed them about the impending visit and the role I had to play as the senior armed forces representative in the reception of the President. They were aware of the President’s visit and assured me that all protocols will be ensured. I tied up with the local Air Force Station to spare their senior officer for the occasion. Our Naval NCC Commander represented the Navy.

I was buoyant with the prospects of receiving the President that too His Excellency Abdul Kalam, who I revered as my role model. Preparations started earnestly and my, buddy and ‘man Friday’ Jagtar Singh got on with his part in real 'Pioneer' devotion. New medal ribands were sewn; the medals were buffed and honed to perfection.  New epaulets and peak cap were procured from Bangalore. The leather, brass and the terricots were all gleaming by the time Jagtar finished with his deft handiwork on them.

The President was to land at 1100h.  We, the Service reps, tied up to meet at our RV at 0830h and proceeded together to the Helipad. As we were closing in to the venue, we found formidable security cordons laid by the police. Since we were travelling in my Staff Car we got through the police cordons with out much difficulty. As we alighted from the vehicle we found a young smart lady Flight Lieutenant from Air Force manning the Air Traffic Control Station specially positioned for the President’s landing. It seemed, among khaki clad officious looking police swarming the area, the sudden presence of few defence service officers came as a great relief for the young girl. We exchanged salutes, pleasantries and stood together conversing to await the arrival of the VVIP.

The venue was teeming with all types of dignitaries. The MP, the Mayor, MLAs, Ministers , Senior Civil Bureaucrats, Social workers, Police officials, Politicians, Religious Heads of the Mutt etc etc. Seeing the crowd I was getting apprehensive as to how to reach the Helicopter breaking through this crowd. So I approached the Commissioner of Police, a friend of mine, who was in a conversation with the District Commissioner and told him of my role and requested him to position us at a vantage point from where it was easy to reach the aircraft when it landed. 

There was a discussion between the District Commissioner and the Commissioner of Police and the latter rushed off to some ‘dhothi’ clad person who had the airs of authority evident from the obsequious entourage surrounding him. After due consultations the commissioner came back and told me that the President is being received by the Mayor, the MP and few selected politicians and I have no part to play and we could go back. I was taken aback and explained to him the mandatory protocol and requested him not to break the protocol. Both the Commissioners were adamant and but I was insistent on my demand. The duo advised me to sit in the front row of the ‘pandal’ erected for guests, where the President would be coming after being received.

I was in a quandary as there was no time left to report the situation to my higher ups, since the President was already airborne and bound for Mysore. I could think of only one solution to the predicament. I called out for the ATC Officer and in the presence of the Commissioner I ordered her to inform the pilot of the helicopter and the Military Secretary to the President (who was also in the entourage with the President), that Mysore Helipad is not yet ready for landing as protocols were being violated.  On hearing this Flt Lt promptly took out her wireless set for communicating with the pilot of the aircraft. The Commissioner realized the gravity of the situation and requested to withhold the communication for a minute. He dashed off to some one in traditional attire and after a brief consultation with him returned with a wry face to usher me and my colleagues to the landing pad, assuring that we would be the first ones to receive the President when he steps out of the aircraft.

With in minutes the helicopter was circling the Helipad for landing. On landing the President came out followed by the Governor and his entourage. As per protocol I received the President. He gave me a firm handshake, read my name tab and asked, “Nair where do you hail from Kerala?” I replied “Alleppey, Sir” “Alleppey – the Venice of the East!!! My old classmate Mahadeva Iyer is from Alleppey. Do you know him?” I said gleefully” Yes Sir “, and then he moved on to my colleague standing on my left.

My mission was accomplished. The protocol was kept. While moving out I passed by lady officer. All beaming, she yelled out ”Congratulations, Sir”. I shook hands with her and told her “You deserve all the credit. All because of your presence of mind of having taken out your wire less set at the right moment.” She then enquired,”Sir, May I ask you a question,  for which I need a frank answer.  Were you serious about what you asked me to do?” I said, “Obviously.. NOT... Just a ruse !!! ”.

XXIII Sikh Pioneers Moto  
“Aut Viam Invenium Aut Faciam”.
 If you don’t find a Road, make one. !!!.

A HILL CALLED MELROSE

"May I have a light?" I looked up to see a Japanese – more or less my age – with an unlit cigarette in his hand. I reached for my lighter. He lit up. We were on a train travelling from Berne to Geneva in the autumn of 1980.

 “Indian?” he asked. “Yes” I replied. 

We got talking.  He was an official in the UN and was returning to home and headquarters at Geneva. I was scheduled to lecture at the university. We chit-chatted for a while; he gave me some useful tips on what to see and where to eat in the city. Then, having exhausted the store of ‘safely tradable information’, we fell silent.  

I retrieved my book – ‘Defeat into Victory’, an account of the Second World War in Burma by Field Marshal William Slim. He opened the newspaper. We travelled in silence.

 After a while he asked “Are you a professor of Military History?” 
“No” I replied- “just interested. My father was in Burma during the war”.

 “Mine too” he said.

In December 1941, Japan invaded Burma and opened the longest land campaign of the entire war for Britain. There were two reasons for the Japanese invasion.

 First, cutting the overland supply route to China via the Burma Road would deprive Chiang Kai Sheik’s Nationalist Chinese armies of military equipment and pave the way for the conquest of China. 

Second, possession of Burma would position them at the doorway to India, where they believed a general insurrection would be triggered against the British once their troops established themselves within reach of Calcutta.

 Entering Burma from Thailand, the Japanese quickly captured Rangoon in 1942, cut off the Burma Road at source and deprived the Chinese of their only convenient supply base and port of entry. Winning battle after battle, they forced theallied forces to retreat into India. The situation was bleak. The British were heavily committed to the war in Europe and lacked the resources and organisation to recapture Burma. 

However, by1943 they got their act together. The High Command was overhauled; Wavell was replaced by Mountbatten and operational control was given to General William Slim, a brilliant officer. Slim imbued his men with a new spirit, rebuilt morale and forged the famous 14th Army, an efficient combat force made up of British, Indians and Africans. 

The Japanese, aware that the defenders were gathering strength, resolved to end the campaign with a bold thrust into India and a simultaneous attack in the Arakan in Burma.

In the ebb and flow of these large events chronicled in Military History, my father, a soldier, played a part – first in Kohima in clearing the Japanese from the Naga Hills, then in Imphal and finally in the deeply forested mountains of Arakan. Destiny took him there. 

In the blinding rain of the monsoons in 1943, the Supreme Allied Commander’s plane landed at Maugdow where the All-India Brigade of which his regiment was a part was headquartered.

 Mountbatten was accompanied by his Chief of Staff, Lt. Gen. Browning, who had been my father’s Adjutant at the Royal Military College in Sandhurst. He and the two other Indian commanders – Thimayya and Sen - were introduced to Mountbatten who made casual but searching enquiries regarding their war experience. Thereafter he was closeted in the ‘conference tent’ with the senior commanders for a long time. As they came out he turned to Reggie Hutton, the Brigade commander and said, “All right Reggie let your All-Indian Brigade do it. But, by God, it is going to be tough”. 

Then turning to the three of them he said, “Gentlemen, the Japanese are pulling out of upper Burma. You have been selected to intercept their withdrawal from there into the South. You will concentrate at Akyab, proceed to Myebon by sea, capture Kangaw, penetrate Japanese-held territory and convert the Japanese retreat into a rout. Is that clear?” It was.

My Japanese friend who had been listening intently leaned forward and asked “Did you say your father was in the All India Brigade?” 

“Yes”, I replied. 

Our conversation paused for a while as the waiter served coffee and croissants.

 Later, picking up the threads he persisted “Was he a junior officer at the time?” 

“Not really” I replied. “He was a Battalion commander”. 

He digested the information and said “Which regiment?” 

“The Punjab Regiment” I replied. His face turned colour. Maybe it was a play of light and shade or maybe it was just my imagination but I thought he was going to be ill.

 “Are you okay?” I queried? He nodded. “Please carry on”.

After marching through hostile territory, the brigade finally landed at Myebon.  Their dis-embarkation was not opposed.  They proceeded to Kangaw little knowing that forty-eight hours later they would be locked in a battle which was to last for a fortnight and claim the lives of three thousand men.

Mountbatten had been right.  The withdrawal route of the Japanese was dominated by ‘Hill Feature 170; Melrose. It was firmly held by the Japanese and gave them the enormous    advantage of having the ‘commanding heights’. Worse, intelligence reported that they had two brigades. The Indians had one. 

 Brigadier Hutton realised that if the withdrawal had to be cut, the hills would have to be captured irrespective of the numerical disadvantage. He took the call. 

The first attack by the Hyderabadis under Thimayya mauled the enemy but did not achieve the objective.

 The second by the Baluchis under Sen met a similar fate. 

It was then that ‘Reggie’ asked the Punjabis to make a final effort. Artillery and air support was coordinated.  The zero hour for the attack was set at 0700 hours on 29 January 1944. At dawn as the leading companies moved forward, the Japanese opened machine gun fire. The Artillery provided cover and laid out a smoke screen. The Punjabis began to climb the hill. Safe from amongst well dug bunkers the Japanese rained fire on them. 

 The Indian casualties mounted as men began to drop. The air cover which was a key part of the plan failed to materialise - bad weather and bad luck. Taking a calculated risk, the commander pushed on. They were hardly a hundred yards from the top when the Japanese threw everything they had at them. In the face of such unrestrained fierceness, the advance faltered hovering uncertainly on the edge of stopping. For the commander, it was the moment of truth – to fight or flee? As he saw his men being mowed down by machine gun fire a rage erupted within him. Throwing caution to the winds he ran forward to be with them. The scales ‘tipped’. The troops rallied, ‘fixed bayonets’ and charged into the Japanese with obscenities and primeval war cries. A fierce hand to hand combat ensued. Neither side took or gave a quarter. The Japanese fought like tigers at bay. The conflict went on unabated through the night. The Japanese counter-attacked in wave after wave but the Indian line held firm. Then the last bullet was fired and there was silence.

Many years later Mountbatten would describe what took place as “The bloodiest battle of the Arakan” and correctly so. 

The price of victory was two thousand Japanese and eight hundred Indians dead in the course of a single encounter. Fifty officers and men would win awards for gallantry. The battalion commander would be decorated with the DSO for ‘unflinching devotion to duty and personal bravery’.  But all that was to happen in the future.

At that particular moment on the field of battle, the commander was looking at the Japanese soldiers who had been taken prisoners of war. They had assembled as soldiers do, neatly and in order. On seeing the Indian Colonel, their commander called his men to attention, stepped forward, saluted, unbuckled his sword, held it in both hands and bowed. 

The Indian was surprised to see that his face was streaked with tears. He understood the pain of defeat but why the tears? After all, this was war. One or the other side had to lose. How could the Japanese explain to the Indian that the tears were not of grief but of shame? How could he make him understand what it meant to be a Samurai? Given a choice he himself would have preferred the nobler course of Hara Keri than surrender. But fate had willed otherwise. The ancestral sword in his hands had been carried with pride by his forefathers. Now he was shaming them by handing it over. 

All this was unknown – unknowable - to the Indian commander. He came from a different culture and had no knowledge of what was going on in the mind of his adversary. 

Yet there was something in the manner and bearing of the officer in front of him which touched him deeply. He found himself moved. 

Without being told he somehow intuited that the moment on hand was not merely solemn but personal and deeply sacred. He accepted the sword and then inexplicably, impelled by an emotion which perhaps only a soldier can feel for a worthy opponent, bent forward and said clearly and loudly in the hearing of all “Colonel I accept the surrender but I receive your sword not as a token of defeat but as a gift from one soldier to another”. The Japanese least expecting this response looked up startled. The light bouncing from the tears on his cheeks, reflected an unspoken gratitude for the Indian’s remark.

 Coming as it did from the heart, it had touched his men and redeemed their – and his – honour.

 The Punjabis – Hindus and Muslims - who had gathered around also nodded in appreciation. Battle was battle. When it was on, they had fought each other with all their strength. And now that it was over there was no personal or national animosity. Maybe the Gods who look after soldiers are different from those who look after other mortals for they bind them in strange webs of understanding and common codes of honour no matter which flags they fly.

The moment passed. He looked at the Signal Officer and nodded. The success signal was fired. Far away in the jungles below, Brigadier Reggie Hutton looked at the three red lights in the sky and smiled. His faith in his commanders had been vindicated. He would later explain that at stake that night was not only the battle objective but the larger issue as to whether Indians ‘had it in them’ to lead men in war. 

There had been sceptics who felt that his faith was misplaced. He looked at Melrose and smiled. Its capture had vindicated his faith.

I looked out of the window lost in my thoughts. Suddenly I heard a sob to find that my Japanese friend had broken down. He swayed from side to side. His eyes were closed and it was clear that he was in the grip of an emotion more powerful than himself. 

He kept saying ‘karma, karma’ and talking to himself in his own language. 

After a while he looked up with eyes full of tears and holding both my hands said in a voice choked with emotion, “It was my father who gave battle to yours on Melrose. It was he who surrendered. Had your father not understood the depth of his feelings, he would have come back and died of shame. But in accepting our ancestral sword in the manner that he did, he restored honour to our family and my father to me. That makes us brothers – you and I.

The train pulled into Geneva station. We got down. What had to be said had already been spoken. He bowed. Goodbye I said. Keep in touch. 

Incidentally, would you like me to restore the sword back to your family. He smiled, looked at me and said “Certainly not. The sword already rests in the house of a Samurai”.

That was the last I saw of him.

Usha tells me that the probability of our meeting defies statistics. She should know. She studied economics and statistics. There was a World war going on.

 Good. My father was in the Indian army; his father was in the Japanese army; perfectly okay. 

They fought in the same theatre of war – Burma; understandable. They fought in the same battle; difficult but believable.

 The war finished, they went back to their families; plausible.

 But that their sons grew up in two different lands, happened to go to Berne at the same time, board the same train, get into the same compartment, share coffee and cigarettes, have a conversation on something that had happened four decades ago, discover their fathers had fought on opposite sides in the same battle – that undoubtedly is insane.

Personally, I do not believe that there are outcomes in life which are necessarily bound to happen?

Yet, sometimes I am not so sure. You can never connect events by looking into the future; you can only connect them by looking at the past. Maybe it is comforting to believe that because the dots connect backward, they will connect forward also. I don’t know. Perhaps in the end, you have to trust in something.  

The sword has a pride of place in our home. Whenever I see it, my mind goes back to the jungles of Arakan where in the midst of the madness of war, two soldiers were able to touch each other and their compatriots with lasting humanity

By Dr Yashwant Thorat, son of Lt Gen SPP Thorat KC DSO.    

Story of Tara Chand, 3 JAT

Courtesy Brig Pradeep Sharma

I first made acquaintence with Tara on commissioning  to the Battalion.
JATs ,known for their simplicity and forthrightness got me puzzled in the initial few months. 

I was told, for example, that a sepoy was" Bhagora!" It made me wonder what kind of a name this was? By and by, with passage of time and a better understanding drew me into the folds of this wonderful community, humble, fierce, gentle and full of affection once they developed confidence and trust in you.

Tara was a boxer of some acclaim and we sweated it out ,me as the team captain and Tara ( amongst others) as a strong contender in his weight. Came the finals of our Inter Battalion Boxing , we watched our boys at each fight with bated breath, cheering at appropriate moments. Tara stepped into the ring amongst a loud ear bursting " Shabash Tara! Ger Diye Pahle Mein!" The fight lasted all of 30 seconds ! The opponent lay flat as the Referee counted 10! 

A couple of years later , I learnt that he was a gallantry award winner in the '65 War , famously known as the "Battle of Dograi"! He would, in his humility, never talk about it. As I prepared for the Battle Honour Day Celebrations , rummaging through old photographs , cassettes and other memorabilia, I found an old cassette captioned "The Battle Of Dograi" in our Officers' Mess collection. Playing the cassette exposed me to a "Gem" of history! 

Melvin De Mello's interview of all the brave men who won accolades and medals in the epic battle! Late Brig DE Hayde, MVC, down the line !

Here is how Tara Chand's interview went:-

De'mello: Aapne is ladai mein kya kiya?

Tara: Sir mein F Echelon se MMG ka ammunition le kar objective tak le gaya tha. 

De Mello: phir kya hua?

Tara: Sahab mein jaise hi Dograi mein ghusa, ek makaan ki chhat se me re par dushman ka fire hua!

De Mello: Phir kya kiya tum ne?

Tara: Sahab meine javabi fire kiya aur daud kar chhat par char gaya, upar jake, darwaza ko thudda mar khola aur carbine se ek ko maar dala!

De Mello: Aur doosre ka kya? 

Tara: Meri carbine mein rok par gayee sahab , to mein daur kar age barha aur usko mukka mara!

De Mello: Mukka mara? To phir kya hua? Usne tum par waar nahin kya ?

Tara: Sahib, boxer hoon, mere mukke se woh chhat se neeche jaa girya. Meine upar se dekha aur turant neeche bhag kar Uttar gaya.

De Melo: Woh zinda tha, kya ?

Tara: Han Sahab jivit tha, peeth par para tha, meine uske muh mein apni water bottle khol kar pani diya, pehle to.

De Mello: Are pani kyon? Woh to dushman tha, na? 

Tara: Haan sahib , par mein hindu hoon! Phir pani pila kar usko bayonet se mar giraya! Dushman to tha hee!

The simplicity  of this conversation has never left my mind .

He fought his rounds with great success up till the level of Services, to retire with honour as a JCO.

Now that years have gone by, one often sits to mull over old thoughts and remember such men with respect and warm affection. 

As I write this, my heart and thoughts are with him, as he battles age and ailment in Jaipur, where he settled down.

Remembered in Japan, forgotten in India...

Does anyone in India know this piece of history?
Answer must be a firm "No" from most of us! 

The day was 12 November, 1948. Tokyo Trials are going on in a huge garden house on the outskirts of Tokyo. The trial of fifty-five Japanese war criminals including Japan's then Prime Minister Tojo, after losing WWII. 
Of these, twenty-eight people have been identified as Class-A (crimes against peace) war criminals. If proved, the only punishment is the "death penalty". 

Eleven international judges from all over the world are announcing...
"Guilty".... 
"Guilty"......
"Guilty"......... )
Suddenly one thundered, "Not Guilty!"

A silence came down in the hallway. Who was this lone dissenter?

His name was Radhabinod Pal a Judge from India.

Born in 1886 in the Kumbh of East Bengal, his mother made a living by taking care of a household and their cow. For feeding the cow, Radha used to take the cow to the land near a local primary school.

When the teacher taught in school, Radha used to listen from outside. One day the school inspector came to visit the school from the city. He asked some questions of the students after entering the class. Everyone was silent. Radha said from outside the classroom window.... "I know the answer to all your questions."  And he answered all the questions one by one. Inspector said... "Wonderful!.. Which class do you read?"

The answer came, "... I do not read...I graze a cow."

Everyone was shocked to hear that. Calling the head teacher, the school inspector instructed the boy to take admission in school as well as provide some stipend.
This is how education of Radha Binod Pal started. 
Then after passing the school final with the highest number in the district, he was admitted to Presidency College.

After taking M Sc. from the University of Calcutta, he studied law again and got the Doctorate title. In the context of choosing the opposite of two things he once said, "law and mathematics are not so different after all.”

Coming back again to the International Court of Tokyo. 

In his convincing argument to the rest of the jurists he signified that the Allies, (winners of WWII), also violated the principles of restraint and neutrality of international law.  In addition to ignoring Japan's surrender hints, they killed two hundred thousand innocent people using nuclear bombardment.

The judges were forced to drop many of the accused from Class-A to B, after seeing the logic written on twelve hundred thirty-two pages by Radhabinod Pal. These Class-B war criminals were saved by him from a sure death penalty. His verdict in the International Court gave him and India a great reputation.

Japan respects this great man. In 1966 Emperor Hirohito awarded him the highest civilian honor of the country, 'Kokko Kunsao'. Two busy roads in Tokyo and Kyoto have been named after him.  Contents of his sentence has been included in the syllabus of their Law . In front of the Supreme Court of Tokyo, his statue has been placed.

In 2007, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe expressed his desire to meet his family members in Delhi and met his son.

Dr. Radhabinod Pal (27 January 1886 - 10 January 1967) name is remembered in the history of Japan. In Tokyo, Japan, he has a museum and a statue in Yasukuni shrine. Japan University has a research center in his name.

Because of his judgment on Japanese war criminals, Chinese  intensely hate him. 

He is the author of many books related to law. In India, almost nobody knew him and perhaps not even his  closest neighbors knew him! 

A hindi movie was made on him, Tokyo Trials, starring Irfan Khan but that movie never made any headlines....

....just one of the many many underrated & unknown Indians, who were Great.

Monday, December 10, 2018

WhatsApp Share - 11 December 2018

*_अतिशय सुंदर रचना आहे. पूर्ण वाचून  घ्या. ही २० कडवी म्हणजे २० रत्ने आहेत._*

अतीकोपता कार्य जाते  लयाला,
अती नम्रता पात्र होते भयाला ।
अती काम ते कोणतेही नसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। १ ।।

अती लोभ आणी जना नित्य लाज,
अती त्याग तो रोकडा मृत्य आज ।
सदा तृप्त नेमस्त सर्वां दिसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। २ ।।

अती मोह हा दु:ख शोकास मूळ,
अती काळजी टाकणे हेही खूळ ।
सदा चित्त हे सद्विचारे कसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। ३ ।।

अती ज्ञान अभ्यासल्या क्षीण काया,
अती खेळणे हा भिकेचाच पाया ।
न कष्टाविणे त्वा रिकामे बसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। ४ ।।

अती दान तेही प्रपंचात छिद्र,
अती हीन कार्पण्य मोठे दरिद्र ।
बरे कोणते ते मनाला पुसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। ५ ।।

अती भोजने रोग येतो घराला,
उपासे अती कष्ट होती नराला ।
फुका सांग देवावरी का रुसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। ६ ।।

अती स्नेह तेथे अवज्ञा उदंड,
अती द्वेष भूलोकीचे पंककुंड ।
अती मत्सरे त्वां कशाला कुसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। ७ ।।

अती आळशी वाचुनी प्रेतरूप,
अती झोप घे तोही त्याचाच भूप ।
सदा सत्कृतीमाजी आत्मा विसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। ८ ।।

अती द्रव्यही जोडते पापरास,
अती घोर दारिद्य्र तो पंकवास ।
धने वैभवे त्वां न केंव्हा फसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। ९ ।।

अती भाषणे वीटती बुद्धिवंत,
अती मौन मूर्खत्व ते मूर्तिमंत ।
खरे तत्त्व ते अल्पशब्दे ठसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। १० ।।

अती वाद घेता दुरावेल सत्य,
अती `होस हो' बोलणे नीचकृत्य ।
विचारे तुवा ज्ञानमार्गी घुसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। ११ ।।

अती औषधे वाढवितात रोग,
उपेक्षा अती आणते सर्व भोग ।
हिताच्या उपायास कां आळसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। १२ ।।

अती दाट वस्तीत नाना उपाधी,
अती शून्य रानात औदास्य बाधी ।
लघुग्राम पाहून तेथे वसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। १३ ।।

अती शोक तो देतसे दुःखवृद्धी,
अती मानतो हर्ष तो क्षूद्रबुद्धी ।
ललाटाक्षरां सांग कोणी पुसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। १४ ।।

अती भूषणे मार्ग तो संकटाचा,
अती थाट तो वेष होतो नटाचा ।
रहावे असे की न कोणी हसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। १५ ।।

स्तुतीला अती बोलती श्वानवृत्ती,
अती लोकनिंदा करी दुष्ट चित्ती ।
न कोणा उगे शब्द स्पर्शे डसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। १६ ।।

अती भांडणे नाश तो यादवांचा,
हठाने अती वंश ना कौरवांचा ।
कराया अती हे न कोणी वसावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। १७ ।।

अती गोड खाणे नसे रोज इष्ट,
कदन्ने अती सेवणे हे कनिष्ठ ।
असोनी गहू व्यर्थ खावे न सावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। १८ ।।

जुन्याचे अती भक्त ते हट्टवादी,
नव्याचे अती लाडके शुद्ध नादी ।
खरे सार शोधोनिया नित्य घ्यावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। १९ ।।

सदा पद्य घोकोनियां शीण येतो,
सदा गद्य वाचोनियां त्रास होतो ।
कधी ते कधी हेही वाचीत जावे,
प्रमाणामधे सर्व काही असावे ।। २० ।।

*शांतपणे वाचा आणि प्रत्येक श्लोक जगा !!!*

Monday, September 28, 2015

Musings of a Confused Soul

MUSINGS OF A CONFUSED SOUL

1.                  What is the ultimate truth; or, is there one at all? We all, beings with a sense of ‘being’, have a mind, a ‘consciousness’; & all that is associated with it – joys  & sorrows, anger & love, cruelty & compassion, attachment & detachment; all of which gives us the identity as “living beings”.  All living beings, including us – humans, trying to make a sense of all that is around us. This is what makes us evolve.

2.                  “History is always written by victors”. Being the most dominant species on earth, the success of evolution is measured by parameters of humans. Let me, then, talk about in terms of humans only, at least for the time being. For us, progress is measured by what we think is good, correct & right. Ironically, this itself is a function of time & space. Otherwise, how do we explain so much of strife from the inception of human civilization, which continues till the present day. We all see ourselves as part of one or another ‘identity’ – language, caste, creed, race, religion, et el. Those who do not conform to our ‘identity’, need to be opposed sometimes, coaxed & cajoled at other times, & should be fought with – even with fatal consequences – at some other times. Isn’t this the way of our biological evolution & societal progress, the vicious circle phenomena of our very existence?

3.                  For the atheists, the natural history of earth is testimony to the fact that life has been wiped off from the face of earth by various natural forces, umpteen numbers of times. For theists, this is the work of God. Be that as it may, for people on both extremes of the faith continuum, destruction & creation, however, remains a reality, a truth. Few people try to make sense of it by cold logic, few others purely by mythology, while most of us use both these in various proportions. There is space for all types of ideas, which is what makes conflict among them inevitable.

4.                  Generations of preachers & multitude of faith systems have tried to propose the ‘correct’ way of doing things, the strict adherence of which has brought order & peace to otherwise chaotic existence of humans – thus the resultant progress. Ironically, it is the unchanging & unchallenging adherence of the same, which has also been the cause of distress to humanity. This implies that there is no perfect “one-size-fits-all” model for all of us. But does it mean that we should stick more unflinchingly to our faiths or should we discard them altogether? Here also there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution.

5.                  We are what we are – just riding along, sailing through. We will keep finding unity in diversity & vice versa. We will keep arguing, loving & fighting each other. The journey of life itself being the destination & change being the only constant. Destruction & creation are the sides of the same coin, simultaneously sharing a symbiotic & antagonistic relation with each other.

Thursday, April 23, 2015

To Be or Not To Be : Dilemma of Politics - Devil's Advocate




DEVIL’S ADVOCATE

TO BE OR NOT TO BE : DILEMMA OF POLITICS

            I was recently watching the news channels a few days ago, when all of them were flashing news about a farmer who allegedly committed suicide in presence of a large gathering in Delhi. The primary concern of all news reporters was the purported ‘politicization’ of the death, as there was a race among all political bigwigs to give statements (most of which were ranging from ludicrous to absolutely stupid) & visit the hospital where the person’s body was was taken. While the death of a farmer is certainly lamentable & could have been averted, the role of media has been definitely overtly negative & shameful. They seemed intent on showing everybody in the police as irresponsible (one reporter was asking questions in a manner to elicit a certain response from people around) & dubbed the complete political class as callous, headline-grabbing, indifferent, etc.

Herein lie the dilemma of politics… To be or not to be!!! Should they give a statement or should they not? Should they visit the deceased or should they not? Mocked if they do it, damned if they don’t… Or should I say – criticized, blasted, cursed – all of it, either way… Their situation is aptly described by the Hindi saying – इधर कुंआ उधर खाई, मै क्या करूं मेरे सांईं.

Politics, a Tough Job

            Being a politician (at any level) is indeed a tough ‘job’. It is arguably one of the the toughest profession in the world. But being a politician in India… My God!!! Isn’t that awful??? Every action, every word, every deed is constantly under public scrutiny 24x7, or should I say – media’s “public scrutiny” (something like when Arnab Goswami says – “India wants to know…”). The very existence is ‘spoken’ about, commented upon & judged by the (supposedly) ‘silent’ majority who elect them – over a cup of tea, over a glass of whiskey, or simply, just like that. But ironically, a politician is as much looked down upon, reviled & made a mockery of (in various forms); as he / she is looked up to, respected & feared. Well, these are the pitfalls & perks of being in such public limelight… Oh, did I forget to mention the constant intrusion of personal life??? And I have still not understood why some politician’s leave or sabbatical should grab the media headlines for so long. Isn’t he too entitled to have a personal life???

The legendary argumentative skills of Indians are put to best use & they are at their eloquent best, when discussing politics in general & politicians in particular. It doesn’t matter whether one is ‘left leaning’, ‘right leaning’, somewhere in between or just ‘nowhere’ in the intellectual continuum; it doesn’t matter whether one has participated in the dance of democracy by exercising his/her right to vote or not; it doesn’t matter whether one has constantly displayed his/her superior social & cultural skills by their conspicuous absence – all of us are entitled, by our ‘birth right’, to discuss the niceties (& not so ‘niceties’) of all our politicians.

Hypocrisy

            Once in college, I told one of my close friends that I wanted to join politics, & my god, he was shocked & appalled!!! With all his best intentions & in all earnest, he told me not to think of such a thing, that politics was synonymous with dishonesty, dishonor & all that was wrong… The idea itself was abhorrent to his sensibilities. We are all like him. The “I want a Bhagat Singh amongst us to lead the change, but not in my house” attitude is prevalent in all of us – the so called ‘common’ people. Aren’t we all ‘politicians’ in our own right – while dealing with our teachers, friends, colleagues & bosses?

            Politics, everywhere, is like this only. Who doesn’t crave to be rich, powerful & influential; who doesn’t want to be master of destiny of others; who doesn’t want to enjoy those privileges? But dare a person say that he/she wants to join politics… Dare a person say that he/she wants to be famous, have money & power... It’s a taboo!!! Our societal hypocrisy is nowhere more starkly evident, when we attach a “holier than thou” & a strictly puritanical approach to the ‘profession’ of politics. I suddenly realized that this is exactly congruent with our attitude towards sex. We all think about it all the time, do it and enjoy it, but only privately!!! Talk about it, discuss it publicly & logically – we cringe, evoke the bogey of culture, values & make a huge noise about it. Is it a surprise that we are the second most populous nation in the world & are soon going to overcome China? Is it a surprise that Sunny Leone is the most searched person over Google, in India?  

As You Sow, So Shall You Reap       

It is oft heard that politics in India is deeply partisan on the lines of religion, caste, creed, community, ethnicity, language, etc; is dirty, immoral, illegal, a profession of thieves, and what not… Our politicians are, after all, ‘our’ representatives; the reflection of our society at large. They are as good, bad or ugly as we, the citizens of India, are. They divide because we are divisive, they don’t care because we are indifferent, they are greedy & selfish because we are after our self-serving interests, they have regressive mindsets because we have a khap-like mentality, they have autocratic tendencies because we ourselves never hesitate to wield our money, muscle or influence over those who don’t have these.

Can we also credit our politicians in the same breath for binding us together as a nation irrespective of our innumerable differences, for our economic & social development irrespective of our humongous population & large size, for giving us international recognition within six decades of our independence, for making the democracy work when all doomsday predictions thought otherwise, for huge strides in science, technology, education & healthcare in spite of insurmountable challenges? We have come a long way & a longer way we have to tread, bigger challenges lie ahead. We have done it earlier, are doing it now & will keep doing it. But nothing could have been achieved without our leaders, our politicians.

Politics is the main instrument of stability, as well as change, in every society & every nation. As they say for the physical phenomenon of friction – it is a necessary evil. You may love it or hate it, you just can’t ignore it & you can’t do without it. The politicians are as good or as bad as we, the citizens, are. We all are ‘reactants’ in the ‘reaction’ of our nation’s destiny, politicians are just the ‘catalysts’. They are what we are. We all have the capability to bring about the change… WE ARE THE CHANGE.